Join the Newsletter

Stay up-to date with food+ag+climate tech and investment trends, and industry-leading news and analysis, globally.

Subscribe to receive the AFN & AgFunder
newsletter each week.

Mark Warner, cofounder, Liberation Labs
Mark Warner, cofounder, Liberation Labs: 'As we get these products closer to market and can show the profitability, we're absolutely convinced that once we start hitting traditional return mechanisms, there's plenty of money there. Often people ask me, ‘What makes you think you can make a product for dollars per kilogram?’ Well I've done it. The last plant I worked on in Brazil, we were making stuff for a few dollars a kilogram. Look at lysine, lactate… there are products that get there.” Mark Warner, cofounder, Liberation Labs.' Image credit: Elaine Watson

🎥Legacy US biomanufacturing network unfit for next wave of bioproducts, says Liberation Labs CEO

May 28, 2024

US biomanufacturing capacity is 40-50 years old and was built for pharmaceuticals, chemicals, and biofuels, says Liberation Labs CEO Mark Warner. It can make the next generation of bioproducts, he says, “but not at the scale or cost structure that’s needed.”

What’s needed, he argues, are modern facilities that can produce everything from enzymes, colors and flavors to dairy proteins, ag biologics and infant formula ingredients, with cost structures that give them a fighting chance to compete.

AgFunderNews caught up with Warner at the SynBioBeta conference in San Jose to discuss:

  • The current state of biomanufacturing capacity in the US.
  • Building—and funding—the new Liberation Labs site in Richmond, Indiana.
  • The role of government in advancing the bioeconomy.
  • What else—aside from fit-for-purpose biomanufacturing capacity—the industry needs.

A ‘legacy’ network?

Liberation Labs is building 600,000-liters of new biomanufacturing capacity in Indiana that is tailored to the needs of the next generation of ingredients made via precision fermentation, explained Warner: “The current network out there today is a legacy network. It averages 40-50 years old and it was built for pharmaceuticals, chemicals, and biofuels. It can make the products that these new technologies want to make [food proteins, flavors, colors, etc], but it’s not making them at the scale or cost structure that’s needed.”

The Richmond facility “is designed for both foods and non foods,” said Warner, a chemical engineer with many years of experience in bioprocess scaleup and commercialization. “It’s got high oxygen transfer aseptic aerobic fermentation, very modern sterile design, and can run very long fermentations. Downstream recovery is designed specifically for very high-yield recovery. It’s multistage ceramic microfiltration, multistage spiral wound ultrafiltration, evaporation, and agglomeration spray drying.

“Honestly in this environment, just to be able to go from sugar to final dried product on the same site, very few facilities can do that today, especially in the US.”

The new site can also run a broader range of organisms than the majority of contract manufacturers, he claimed. “The best example would be methanol-fed [yeast] Pichia Pastoris, the most common GRAS-approved organism in the US today. Very few of these legacy facilities can run it. It’s very hard to retrofit an old facility to accept methanol. When we look at the range of organisms out there, we’re confident we can host the majority of them.”

Funding the bioeconomy

Asked about funding the $115 million Liberation Labs facility in Richmond, he said: “So far we’ve been able to raise $36 million of equity; we’ve got a $30 million equipment financing mechanism; and a $25 million USDA loan guarantee; and we’re in the late stages of a fundraise now. We’ve had an external lead since the end of last year, and we’re expecting a close in the $75 million range by the middle of this year, which will give us additional runway and money to use towards development of additional projects.”

In general, he said, “We’re absolutely convinced that once we start hitting traditional return mechanisms, there’s plenty of money there. But we need to get those binding offtakes, and acknowledge that everybody along the supply chain needs to make some margin.”

The unit economics of precision fermentation

Interest in using the Richmond facility has come from a mix of startups and larger companies in the food and non-food space, he said. “We have confidence that by the time the facility comes on early next year, we’ll have ample backlog under contract.”

As to whether the unit economics of precision fermentation only make sense for very high-value ingredients, rather than commodity-type food proteins such as casein and whey, he said. “Food products, especially commodities like whey, are challenging, and need probably the bigger facility we have planned to really get to cost parity. But there’s a lot of other products, materials, infant formula components, agricultural biologics, that are already very profitable both for us and for the end user today.”

Improved strains, continuous processing…

When it comes to the various levers the industry can pull to drive efficiency in biomanufacturing, he said: “We’ve been impressed by the strain improvements we’ve seen over the last couple of years as we’ve talked to both startups and large CPG type companies.”

As for continuous processing, which is often touted as a potential gamechanger for the industry, he said, “What I would say is we like to focus on productivity. A batch fermentation that gives me a high titer [the amount of an expressed target molecule relative to the volume of liquid] in one day could be better than a week-long continuous [operation].

“If you run continuous fermentation, what you really need is a robust sterile design, and we believe being more modern than the other facilities, if continuous fermentation gets to that [more advanced] stage, we’ll be set up to run it. But fed-batch and draw and fill [a semi-continuous process] are our base case, which are about halfway to two thirds of the way to continuous fermentation.”

Further reading:

SynBioBeta 2024: From novel hosts to ‘tricking’ cells to be more productive… addressing the ‘scale-cost paradox’ in biomanufacturing

🎥 Wild Microbes CEO: ‘Today the bioeconomy runs on a handful of microorganisms; in future it will run on hundreds’

🎥Hyfé looks to waste streams to power the next generation of sustainable feedstocks for biomanufacturing

🎥Fats from fermentation: Chewing the designer fat with Nourish Ingredients

🎥Hoxton Farms tackles fat, the final frontier for alt meat

🎥Coffee with a kick… but no caffeine? Rarebird spills the beans on paraxanthine

Meet the founder: Werewool’s Chui-Lian Lee harnesses microbes to create colorful fabrics… without dyes

Join the Newsletter

Get the latest news & research from AFN and AgFunder in your inbox.

Join the Newsletter
Get the latest news and research from AFN & AgFunder in your inbox.

Follow us:

AgFunder Research
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Join Newsletter